I build observable factories.
Engineer and researcher at KIT, working toward industrial system architecture.
Minimum viable observability. Before a factory can become AI-native, it needs reliable traces of what is happening. I focus on the smallest useful layer of sensors, manual checkpoints, event streams, and process records that can make a production line observable. The first milestone is not automation. It is knowing what is happening well enough to reason about it.
Reliable industrial data infrastructure. Low-digital-maturity factories rarely need another dashboard first. They need timestamps, identifiers, schemas, validation, storage, and ownership: the quiet infrastructure that turns raw activity into usable data. A factory that owns its data can improve its process without renting its memory from disconnected tools.
Systems that can be maintained. I am deliberately moving toward system architecture and long-term maintainership: designing software, infrastructure, and operating routines that a manufacturing company can keep using after the pilot is over. The work has to survive contact with real operators, real orders, and real maintenance constraints.
Uncertainty-aware production models. Once the factory is observable, the research opens up: process reconstruction, probabilistic state estimation, belief propagation, adaptive inference, world models, and decision support for incomplete industrial data. Advanced AI becomes meaningful only after the production system has a structured reality to reason over.
Research carried by real factories. KIT gives the academic environment for my researchs; motivated facilities gives a real manufacturing validation environment. The company work is the vehicle that tests whether the methods survive practice. Research creates the technology, pilots validate it, and the company carries it into industry.
Engineer, researcher, system architect in training.. I work at the boundary between industrial software engineering and applied research. My focus is how low-digital-maturity manufacturing environments can become observable, data-driven, and eventually adaptive without pretending they already have clean real-time data.
Start with one production line.. The first research pilot should be narrow enough to validate. One workflow, one line, one set of events. Map the process, instrument what matters, capture missing and noisy data honestly, then reconstruct the state of production.
From paper workflows to adaptive industrial systems.. The long-term goal is not a flashy AI layer on top of chaos. It is a maintained system architecture where data collection, process knowledge, uncertainty-aware inference, and industrial agents can grow from the same foundation.
Skytex Georgia is a real embroidery manufacturing environment with low digital infrastructure and mostly manual workflows. That makes it a strong validation environment for my research goal: turning a factory from paper-based operation into an observable, maintainable, and eventually AI-native production system. The current work combines product and wholesale software with the first owned digital operating layer. I am looking for supervisors, collaborators, and manufacturing environments where this work can mature from pilot infrastructure into maintainable industrial systems. Write me if this overlaps with your work.
Solutions · Essays · Demos · LinkedIn · GitHub · Email